Solana (SOL) Is Just as Ethereum (ETH): Here’s How

Both assets have similar traits, but can they be considered ‘money’?

Digital assets like Solana (SOL) and Ethereum (ETH) have evolved to become more than mere currencies; they are now platforms for decentralized applications. This evolution has blurred the lines between traditional means of exchange and digital assets. However, some people believe they can still be used as means of exchange.

Unlike regular money, cryptocurrencies possess traits such as programmability, interoperability and self-executing smart contracts. They are not just used for buying and selling goods but also for creating decentralized financial systems and other applications.

Ethereum has long been the leader in the smart contract platform space. However, Solana has emerged as a formidable contender, with both networks now operating on proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanisms.

This shift to PoS for Ethereum, known as Ethereum 2.0, marks a significant transition toward a more energy-efficient and scalable network. Solana, on the other hand, was built on PoS from the ground up, focusing on high throughput and low transaction costs, which has attracted a substantial user base and developer community.

Comparing Ethereum and Solana, one must look beyond just the monetary value. Both networks provide a foundation for building decentralized applications (dApps), but they approach scalability and transaction speed differently. Ethereum’s transition to PoS aims to address its scalability issues, whereas Solana has been marketed as a “high-performance blockchain,” capable of handling many more transactions per second from the outset.

The SOLETH charts reflect Solana’s poor performance against Ethereum, indicating a strong preference of Ethereum among investors, likely after the most recent outage on the Solana network. Ethereum’s larger ecosystem and longer track record provide it with a more substantial market capitalization and a broader range of dApps.

About the author